Mark Kelly
Democrat · AZ Senate · 119th Congress
and Nuclear Innovation and Safety (Chair) · Joint Economic Committee · Senate Committee on Armed Services · Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · and Mining · Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works · Waste Management · Environmental Justice · and Regulatory Oversight · and Water · Senate Select Committee on Intelligence · Senate Special Committee on Aging
Influence Score
78.8
Highly exposed
↓ -9.5 vs 118th (88.3)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
4.5
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
6.0
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$45,206,081
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$81,505,314
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.3
/ 10
Revolving door (7 lobbyists) former staff now working as lobbyists
1.7
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
6.7
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.3
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.2
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
12.2
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
7.4
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
8.7
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
10.1
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
JSTREETPAC $4,953 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $44.70M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $89K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 40.2 Least exposed
117th · 2021-2023 76.3 Most exposed
118th · 2023-2025 88.3 Most exposed
119th · 2025-2027 78.8 Highly exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $18,546,485
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Network VOTEVETS
Share from this one network 5.6%
Amount from this network $92,500
Total from all networks $1,658,633
Networks contributing 270
— ◊ —
Who funds Kelly
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 78.8 · Highly exposed · votes with them 80%
$46,001,804
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 9.1%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 46.7%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 5
Money that arrived near votes $14K
Distinct donors 6
Distinct employers 4
Share of their total fundraising 0.29%
Biggest clusters of timed money
JOHN GORRIE INVESTMENT
20240125 · 2 contributions · Finance · 13d from vote (pre)
$5K
JOHN GORRIE INVESTMENT
20240731 · 1 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (post)
$5K
WELLS FARGO ADVISORS
20240125 · 1 contributions · Finance · 13d from vote (pre)
$2K
SV ANGEL
20230929 · 1 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (mixed)
$1K
BANK OF AMERICA
20241008 · 1 contributions · Finance · 13d from vote (post)
$1K
AGM FINANCIAL SERVICES
20240131 · 2 contributions · Finance · 7d from vote (pre)
$500
AGM FINANCIAL SERVICES
20240309 · 1 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (mixed)
$500
AGM FINANCIAL SERVICES
20240427 · 2 contributions · Finance · 4d from vote (post)
$500
WELLS FARGO BANK
20240324 · 1 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (post)
$500
CORD INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
20240804 · 1 contributions · Finance · 5d from vote (post)
$250
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
893 contributions · cycle 2022
$95K
GOOGLE
319 contributions · cycle 2022
$95K
APPLE
437 contributions · cycle 2022
$72K
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
625 contributions · cycle 2022
$60K
MICROSOFT
268 contributions · cycle 2022
$59K
INTEL
559 contributions · cycle 2022
$43K
WILMERHALE
41 contributions · cycle 2022
$40K
KIRKLAND ELLIS LLP
60 contributions · cycle 2022
$40K
MOTLEY RICE
20 contributions · cycle 2022
$39K
AMAZON
190 contributions · cycle 2022
$35K
JANE STREET
16 contributions · cycle 2022
$32K
BANNER HEALTH
358 contributions · cycle 2022
$31K
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
152 contributions · cycle 2022
$29K
YALE UNIVERSITY
87 contributions · cycle 2022
$26K
RAYTHEON
422 contributions · cycle 2022
$26K
MIT
213 contributions · cycle 2022
$23K
HARVARD UNIVERSITY
180 contributions · cycle 2022
$23K
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
182 contributions · cycle 2022
$22K
IBM
284 contributions · cycle 2022
$22K
US GOVERNMENT
142 contributions · cycle 2022
$22K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Mark Kelly comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $62.93M
Disclosed outside spending $41.97M
Dark-money outside spending $20.96M
Share that is dark money 33.31%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $4.85M
Groups hiding their donors 25
By funding network
NRSC
for them $0 · against them $38.39M · 128 transactions
$38.39M
DEFENDARIZONA
for them $0 · against them $34.10M · 138 transactions
$34.10M
SLF PAC
for them $0 · against them $29.71M · 90 transactions
$29.71M
SAVING ARIZONA PAC
for them $0 · against them $16.68M · 139 transactions
$16.68M
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION
for them $0 · against them $15.94M · 95 transactions
$15.94M
PRIORITIES USA ACTION
for them $15.45M · against them $0 · 129 transactions
$15.45M
THE SENTINEL ACTION FUND
for them $0 · against them $13.35M · 26 transactions
$13.35M
SMP
for them $8.92M · against them $0 · 56 transactions
$8.92M
LCV VICTORY FUND
for them $8.43M · against them $0 · 49 transactions
$8.43M
SOMOS PAC
for them $7.62M · against them $0 · 103 transactions
$7.62M
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN INC.
for them $0 · against them $5.91M · 16 transactions
$5.91M
PATRIOT MAJORITY PAC
for them $2.83M · against them $0 · 6 transactions
$2.83M
OUR AMERICAN CENTURY
for them $0 · against them $2.56M · 4 transactions
$2.56M
EDF ACTION VOTES
for them $2.32M · against them $0 · 15 transactions
$2.32M
WOMEN SPEAK OUT PAC
for them $0 · against them $2.27M · 99 transactions
$2.27M
Groups that hide their donors
501(c)(4) confirmed · oppose
$6.68M
501(c)(4) confirmed · support
$4.01M
c4-funded super PAC · support
$3.68M
c4-funded super PAC · support
$1.99M
c4-funded super PAC · support
$1.41M
501(c)(4) probable · support
$659K
c4-funded super PAC · support
$560K
501(c)(4) probable · support
$456K
c4-funded super PAC · oppose
$397K
Independent-expenditure entity · support
$282K
4 smaller groups under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$894
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
PLANNED PARENTHOOD VOTES
NY · 2 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$10.50M
WORKING FAMILIES PARTY PAC
NY · 3 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$8.23M
COMMUNITY CHANGE VOTERS
DC · 2 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$3.15M
AMERICA VOTES
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$2.20M
WAY TO LEAD PAC
AZ · 2 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$600K
JAMES SANDLER
SANDLER · CA · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$500K
MOVEMENT VOTER PAC
MA · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$460K
AFSCME
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$400K
JEFF DEAN
GOOGLE · CA · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$400K
UFCW LOCAL 99 PAC
AZ · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$256K
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

427 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $1.38M to Mark Kelly across 1,479 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $1.38M
Shared contributors 427
Contributions 1,479
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 360 1,144 $738K
2024 20 133 $296K
2026 94 202 $348K
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
2 former staff members who worked for Mark Kelly or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
Lobbyist Former position Firm Clients Filings Years
ED GERAK Senator Sinema, Senator Kelly, Congressman Grijalva, Congressman Ciscomani and C… IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA, INC. 1 4 2023–2025
JENELL BIGGS SMOLOVA AZ members: Ciscomani, Biggs, Crane, Gosar, Hamadeh, Senator Mark Kelly and Sen … UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 6 2023–2025
— ◊ —

Mark Kelly's file shows clear influence markers across multiple categories for the top funding network, placing them in the upper range of this Congress. The pattern runs above what coincidence would produce, and the methodology page documents what each category requires.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required