Ruben Gallego
Democrat · AZ Senate · 119th Congress
Senate Committee on Banking (Chair) · Commission on Security and Cooperation in Europe · House Committee on Armed Services · House Committee on Natural Resources · and Public Lands · House Committee on Veterans' Affairs · and Urban Affairs · and Community Development · Senate Committee on Energy and Natural Resources · Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · Federal Workforce · and Regulatory Affairs · Senate Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Influence Score
67.2
Moderately exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
5.0
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
6.0
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$48,481,391
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$44,255,535
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.7
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
7.7
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.8
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
7.1
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
8.6
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.7
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
8.0
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
DMFI PAC $5,000 direct · $1,608 outside spending
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $39.50M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $79K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 60.3 Moderately exposed
117th · 2021-2023 66.6 Moderately exposed
118th · 2023-2025 81.7 Most exposed
119th · 2025-2027 67.2 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $13,412,090
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Network SOMOS PAC
Share from this one network 11.3%
Amount from this network $250,000
Total from all networks $2,220,572
Networks contributing 411
— ◊ —
Who funds Gallego
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 67.2 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 84%
$49,355,722
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 15.4%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 40.8%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 89
Money that arrived near votes $250K
Distinct donors 122
Distinct employers 74
Share of their total fundraising 0.67%
Biggest clusters of timed money
BAIN CAPITAL
20240617 · 3 contributions · Finance · 6d from vote (mixed)
$7K
BERKSHIRE
20240305 · 3 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (mixed)
$7K
BESSEMER VENTURE
20240313 · 2 contributions · Finance · 5d from vote (mixed)
$7K
BLOOMBERG
20240626 · 2 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (pre)
$7K
BLUESTEM ASSET MANAGEMENT
20231211 · 2 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (mixed)
$7K
D E SHAW RESEARCH
20240730 · 3 contributions · Finance · 6d from vote (post)
$7K
EVERCORE
20240526 · 2 contributions · Finance · 3d from vote (post)
$7K
GREYLOCK
20240308 · 2 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (mixed)
$7K
JANE STREET
20231225 · 2 contributions · Finance · 13d from vote (post)
$7K
KLEINER PERKINS
20240709 · 2 contributions · Finance · 2d from vote (mixed)
$7K
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
GOOGLE
179 contributions · cycle 2024
$64K
MOTLEY RICE
16 contributions · cycle 2024
$42K
APPLE
91 contributions · cycle 2024
$37K
ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
387 contributions · cycle 2024
$35K
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
391 contributions · cycle 2024
$34K
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
65 contributions · cycle 2024
$33K
BLACKSTONE
10 contributions · cycle 2026
$32K
WILMERHALE
28 contributions · cycle 2024
$31K
ASU
191 contributions · cycle 2024
$27K
LIEFF CABRASER HEIMANN BERNSTEIN LLP
16 contributions · cycle 2024
$26K
STATE OF ILLINOIS
13 contributions · cycle 2024
$25K
DRAGONEER INVESTMENT
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$23K
ATTORNEY
35 contributions · cycle 2024
$22K
INVARIANT
18 contributions · cycle 2024
$21K
AT T
70 contributions · cycle 2024
$21K
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY
106 contributions · cycle 2024
$20K
BAIN CAPITAL
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$20K
COMPETITIVE ENGINEERING
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$20K
RAYTHEON
115 contributions · cycle 2024
$19K
BANNER HEALTH
254 contributions · cycle 2024
$19K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Ruben Gallego comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $46.16M
Disclosed outside spending $24.81M
Dark-money outside spending $21.35M
Share that is dark money 46.25%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $3.04M
Groups hiding their donors 18
By funding network
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION
for them $0 · against them $31.47M · 106 transactions
$31.47M
FAIRSHAKE
for them $20.08M · against them $0 · 10 transactions
$20.08M
ESAFUND
for them $0 · against them $6.36M · 22 transactions
$6.36M
VOTEVETS
for them $5.80M · against them $0 · 25 transactions
$5.80M
LCV VICTORY FUND
for them $5.78M · against them $0 · 77 transactions
$5.78M
SOMOS PAC
for them $4.17M · against them $0 · 37 transactions
$4.17M
DEMOCRACY PAC
for them $3.65M · against them $0 · 42 transactions
$3.65M
JEFFERSON RISING
for them $0 · against them $2.49M · 33 transactions
$2.49M
THE 1861 INITIATIVE
for them $2.24M · against them $0 · 18 transactions
$2.24M
THE SENTINEL ACTION FUND
for them $0 · against them $1.59M · 4 transactions
$1.59M
WOMEN SPEAK OUT PAC
for them $0 · against them $1.44M · 22 transactions
$1.44M
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE COUNTY & MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES P E O P L E
for them $1.05M · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$1.05M
NATIONAL NURSES UNITED FOR PATIENT PROTECTION
for them $912K · against them $0 · 41 transactions
$912K
PROGRESSIVE CENTURY PROJECT
for them $341K · against them $515K · 45 transactions
$856K
ONE FOR ALL COMMITTEE
for them $767K · against them $0 · 15 transactions
$767K
Groups that hide their donors
c4-funded super PAC · oppose
$15.48M
501(c)(4) confirmed · support
$2.81M
c4-funded super PAC · support
$1.96M
501(c)(4) confirmed · oppose
$794K
501(c)(4) confirmed · support
$115K
501(c)(4) confirmed · support
$60K
c4-funded super PAC · support
$58K
501(c)(4) probable · support
$23K
Independent-expenditure entity · support
$10K
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$384
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
ANNIE MAHON
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$330K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 3 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$133K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 3 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$129K
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 3 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$110K
CHRIS PAPPAS FOR CONGRESS
NH · 3 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$110K
ANGIE CRAIG FOR CONGRESS
MN · 3 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$102K
SUSAN WILD FOR CONGRESS
PA · 3 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$97K
EVERYDAY PEOPLE
CA · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$75K
PAT RYAN FOR CONGRESS
NY · 3 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$75K
ENGEL FOR ARIZONA
AZ · 2 dark entities
coverage 100.0%
$74K
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

393 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $737K to Ruben Gallego across 685 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $737K
Shared contributors 393
Contributions 685
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 49 61 $234K
2024 352 620 $499K
2026 2 4 $3K
— ◊ —

Ruben Gallego sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required