Jill N. Tokuda
Democrat · HI-2 · 119th Congress
and Biotechnology (Chair) · House Committee on Agriculture · House Committee on Armed Services · House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
Influence Score
49.3
Least exposed
↓ -1.1 vs 118th (50.4)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
2.2
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
1.2
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$438,529
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$1,206,912
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.0
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
8.3
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.2
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
10.5
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
3.4
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.7
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
4.9
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
JSTREETPAC $5,000 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $23.71M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $47K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 —
117th · 2021-2023 —
118th · 2023-2025 50.4 Moderately exposed
119th · 2025-2027 49.3 Least exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $163,618
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 4.3%
Amount from this network $27,500
Total from all networks $639,827
Networks contributing 115
— ◊ —
Who funds Tokuda
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 49.3 · Least exposed · votes with them 86%
$824,606
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 94.4%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 0.2%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 1
Money that arrived near votes $1K
Distinct donors 1
Distinct employers 1
Share of their total fundraising 0.13%
Biggest clusters of timed money
BOOZ ALLEN HAMILTON
20230609 · 1 contributions · Defense · 11d from vote (pre)
$1K
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
EO SOLUTIONS
6 contributions · cycle 2026
$19K
MATSON
15 contributions · cycle 2024
$19K
MATSON
22 contributions · cycle 2022
$17K
STATE OF HAWAII
33 contributions · cycle 2022
$16K
KAIMANA HILA
5 contributions · cycle 2022
$12K
MATSON
13 contributions · cycle 2026
$12K
ALPHA
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$11K
KAIMANA HILA
11 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII
16 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
IMANAKA ASATO LLLC
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$8K
COMMUNITY PLANNING AND ENGINEERING
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
ANTHROPIC
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
ANTHROPIC PBC
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
R M TOWILL
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$7K
KOBAYASHI
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$7K
ZEPHYR INSURANCE
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
KAIMANA HILA
6 contributions · cycle 2026
$6K
CENTRAL PACIFIC BANK
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$6K
MATSON NAVIGATION
10 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
HAWAII PACIFIC HEALTH
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$6K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Jill N. Tokuda comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
VOTEVETS
for them $0 · against them $850K · 8 transactions
$850K
THE 1861 INITIATIVE
for them $377K · against them $0 · 7 transactions
$377K
MAINSTREAM DEMOCRATS PAC
for them $0 · against them $357K · 4 transactions
$357K
MEDICARE FOR ALL
for them $60K · against them $0 · 6 transactions
$60K
DEMOCRATIC PARTY OF HAWAII
for them $945 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$945
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE PAC , SERVING WA, AK, ID, HI, IN, KY
for them $417 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$417
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $10 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$10
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

53 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $383K to Jill N. Tokuda across 84 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $383K
Shared contributors 53
Contributions 84
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 29 30 $58K
2024 21 36 $134K
2026 14 18 $191K
— ◊ —

Jill N. Tokuda ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required