← All 2026 races
S6GA00408
DOOLEY, DEREK Challenger
11.4
Influence Score · 2026
Substantially backed
Non-incumbent — only contributions, independent expenditures, and dark-money exposure are scored.
Lobbying, vote alignment, bundle timing, and trade direction require committee assignments and
roll-call records, neither of which exist for a non-sitting candidate. Maximum reachable score is
about 23, on a challenger-only scale — incumbents are scored 0–100 across all twelve axes, so the two
are not directly comparable. See methodology.
Score components
| Axis | Raw | Normalized (pts) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct contributions | $4.33M | 8.00 | 2026 cycle, principal committee |
| Outside spending — direct support | $6.16M | — | PACs that directly supported this candidate |
| Outside spending — indirect (OPPOSE against opponents) | $356K | — | OPPOSE spending against opponents in the same race, attributed proportionally |
| Outside spending — OPPOSE against this candidate | $0 | — | PACs that spent to defeat this candidate (not scored on this axis) |
| Total outside spending in favor | $6.51M | 3.42 | direct + indirect — drives the outside-spending axis |
| Lobbying exposure | — | — | Requires committee assignment |
| Vote alignment | — | — | Requires voting record |
| Contribution timing — money arriving near key votes | — | — | Requires recorded-vote calendar |
| Dark-money exposure | 0.0000 | 0.00 | Disclosed-vs-dark outside spending share |
| Personal trade direction | — | — | Requires STOCK Act filings |
Race matchup GA Senate
| Candidate | Party | Status | Direct $ | Outside $ | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OSSOFF, T. JONATHAN | DEM | Inc. | $585K | $5.13M | 53.0 | Highly exposed |
| DOOLEY, DEREK | REP | Chal. | $4.33M | $6.51M | 11.4 | Substantially backed |
| COLLINS, MICHAEL A JR | REP | Chal. | $3.94M | $1.42M | 9.6 | Substantially backed |
| CARTER, EARL LEROY | REP | Chal. | $3.49M | $234K | 8.6 | Substantially backed |
| KING, JOHN | REP | Chal. | $826K | $356K | 3.9 | Modestly backed |
Challenger and open-seat scores reflect contributions, outside spending, and dark-money exposure only — a maximum of about 23. They are not directly comparable to incumbent scores, which run 0–100 across all twelve axes. Compare the dollar columns (Direct $, Outside $) for a like-for-like view.