BOAFO, ADRIAN Open seat

· MD-5 (House)

2.1

Influence Score · 2026

Lightly backed

Non-incumbent — only contributions, independent expenditures, and dark-money exposure are scored. Lobbying, vote alignment, bundle timing, and trade direction require committee assignments and roll-call records, neither of which exist for a non-sitting candidate. Maximum reachable score is about 23, on a challenger-only scale — incumbents are scored 0–100 across all twelve axes, so the two are not directly comparable. See methodology.

Score components

Axis	Raw	Normalized (pts)	Coverage
Direct contributions	$0	0.00	2026 cycle, principal committee
Outside spending — direct support	$2.56M	—	PACs that directly supported this candidate
Outside spending — indirect (OPPOSE against opponents)	$0	—	OPPOSE spending against opponents in the same race, attributed proportionally
Outside spending — OPPOSE against this candidate	$0	—	PACs that spent to defeat this candidate (not scored on this axis)
Total outside spending in favor	$2.56M	2.15	direct + indirect — drives the outside-spending axis
Lobbying exposure	—	—	Requires committee assignment
Vote alignment	—	—	Requires voting record
Contribution timing — money arriving near key votes	—	—	Requires recorded-vote calendar
Dark-money exposure	0.0000	0.00	Disclosed-vs-dark outside spending share
Personal trade direction	—	—	Requires STOCK Act filings

Race matchup MD-5

Candidate	Party	Status	Direct $	Outside $	Score	Tier
HOYER, STENY	DEM	Inc.	$2.52M	$8K	56.0	Highly exposed
BOAFO, ADRIAN	DEM	Open	$0	$2.56M	2.1	Lightly backed
DUNN, HARRY	DEM	Open	$247K	$600	1.0	Lightly backed
WILLIAMS, NICOLE	DEM	Open	$32K	$0	0.1	Lightly backed
BLEGAY, WALA	DEM	Open	$0	$0	0.0	Lightly backed

Challenger and open-seat scores reflect contributions, outside spending, and dark-money exposure only — a maximum of about 23. They are not directly comparable to incumbent scores, which run 0–100 across all twelve axes. Compare the dollar columns (Direct $, Outside $) for a like-for-like view.