← All 2026 races
H4NC01137
BUCKHOUT, LAURIE Challenger
9.8
Influence Score · 2026
Substantially backed
Non-incumbent — only contributions, independent expenditures, and dark-money exposure are scored.
Lobbying, vote alignment, bundle timing, and trade direction require committee assignments and
roll-call records, neither of which exist for a non-sitting candidate. Maximum reachable score is
about 23, on a challenger-only scale — incumbents are scored 0–100 across all twelve axes, so the two
are not directly comparable. See methodology.
Score components
| Axis | Raw | Normalized (pts) | Coverage |
|---|---|---|---|
| Direct contributions | $2.38M | 8.00 | 2026 cycle, principal committee |
| Outside spending — direct support | $1.75M | — | PACs that directly supported this candidate |
| Outside spending — indirect (OPPOSE against opponents) | $274 | — | OPPOSE spending against opponents in the same race, attributed proportionally |
| Outside spending — OPPOSE against this candidate | $90K | — | PACs that spent to defeat this candidate (not scored on this axis) |
| Total outside spending in favor | $1.75M | 1.77 | direct + indirect — drives the outside-spending axis |
| Lobbying exposure | — | — | Requires committee assignment |
| Vote alignment | — | — | Requires voting record |
| Contribution timing — money arriving near key votes | — | — | Requires recorded-vote calendar |
| Dark-money exposure | 0.0000 | 0.00 | Disclosed-vs-dark outside spending share |
| Personal trade direction | — | — | Requires STOCK Act filings |
Race matchup NC-1
| Candidate | Party | Status | Direct $ | Outside $ | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DAVIS, DON | DEM | Inc. | $1.38M | $10.40M | 58.3 | Highly exposed |
| BUCKHOUT, LAURIE | REP | Chal. | $2.38M | $1.75M | 9.8 | Substantially backed |
| ROBERSON, SANDY | REP | Chal. | $514K | $23K | 2.2 | Lightly backed |
| HANIG, BOBBY | REP | Chal. | $233K | $23K | 1.1 | Lightly backed |
| RUSSELL, ASHLEY NICOLE | REP | Chal. | $69K | $40K | 0.5 | Lightly backed |
Challenger and open-seat scores reflect contributions, outside spending, and dark-money exposure only — a maximum of about 23. They are not directly comparable to incumbent scores, which run 0–100 across all twelve axes. Compare the dollar columns (Direct $, Outside $) for a like-for-like view.