Jack Reed
Democrat · RI Senate · 119th Congress
Housing and Urban Development (Chair) · and Related Agencies (Chair) · Senate Committee on Armed Services (Chair) · Senate Committee on Appropriations · Health and Human Services · and Education · Veterans Affairs · Senate Committee on Banking · and Urban Affairs · and Community Development · and Investment · Senate Select Committee on Intelligence
Influence Score
68.7
Moderately exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
3.5
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
< 0.1
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$9
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
8.2
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
7.2
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
1.6
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
12.0
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
4.6
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
10.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
7.8
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
JSTREETPAC $5,000 direct
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $4,994 direct
NORPAC $1,000 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $234.38M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $469K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 58.7 Moderately exposed
117th · 2021-2023 67.3 Highly exposed
118th · 2023-2025 44.9 Least exposed
119th · 2025-2027 68.7 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $30,000
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 1.7%
Amount from this network $20,000
Total from all networks $1,194,544
Networks contributing 253
— ◊ —
Who funds Reed
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 68.7 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 82%
$614,809
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 0.9%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 3
Money that arrived near votes $9K
Distinct donors 4
Distinct employers 3
Share of their total fundraising 1.35%
Biggest clusters of timed money
JANE STREET CAPITAL
20230929 · 2 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (mixed)
$7K
CITIZENS BANK
20240409 · 1 contributions · Finance · 14d from vote (pre)
$1K
RAYTHEON
20230809 · 1 contributions · Defense · 13d from vote (post)
$1K
TEAMSTERS LOCAL 251
20230315 · 1 contributions · Labor · 14d from vote (post)
$250
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
EO SOLUTIONS
8 contributions · cycle 2026
$28K
CLIFFORD LAW OFFICES
5 contributions · cycle 2026
$18K
GENERAL ATOMICS
11 contributions · cycle 2022
$16K
SEACORP
18 contributions · cycle 2026
$15K
BROWNSTEIN HYATT FARBER SCHRECK
14 contributions · cycle 2026
$15K
STARKEY
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$12K
MANDELL BOISCLAIR MANDELL
5 contributions · cycle 2026
$12K
COONEY AND CONWAY
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
CVS HEALTH
7 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
PICERNE REAL ESTATE
8 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
ROSEN
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
STRATEGIC MARKETING INNOVATIONS
5 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
GREENBERG TRAURIG
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
INNOVATIVE DEFENSE TECHNOLOGIES
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$9K
BLUEWATER WIRELESS
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$8K
BLUE ORIGIN
7 contributions · cycle 2026
$8K
SEACORP
14 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
ALLEN AND
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
ANALYSIS
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
APOLLO MANAGEMENT
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Jack Reed comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $8
Disclosed outside spending $0
Dark-money outside spending $8
Share that is dark money 100.00%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
DEMOCRACY PAC
for them $124 · against them $0 · 5 transactions
$124
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$8
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT · NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$525.74M
SMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$47.25M
AB PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$25.50M
HMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
CARE IN ACTION PAC
NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$6.60M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

21 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $337K to Jack Reed across 26 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $337K
Shared contributors 21
Contributions 26
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2024 4 4 $304K
2026 17 22 $32K
— ◊ —

Jack Reed sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required