Andy Kim
Democrat · NJ Senate · 119th Congress
Tax and Capital Access (Chair) · Senate Committee on Banking (Chair) · District of Columbia (Chair) · and Census (Chair) · House Committee on Armed Services · Innovative Technologies · and Information Systems · House Committee on Foreign Affairs · the Pacific · Central Asia · and Nonproliferation · International Organizations · and Global Corporate Social Impact · House Committee on Small Business · and Capital Access · and Urban Affairs · and Investment · Senate Committee on Commerce · and Transportation · and Innovation · and Safety · Senate Committee on Health · and Pensions · Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs · Senate Special Committee on Aging
Influence Score
64.6
Moderately exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
2.4
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
2.5
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$1,839,740
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$649,578
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
7.8
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
8.4
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
4.7
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
10.0
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
3.7
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
6.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
6.1
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
JSTREETPAC $17,047 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $66.83M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $134K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 68.7 Highly exposed
117th · 2021-2023 71.7 Highly exposed
118th · 2023-2025 70.5 Highly exposed
119th · 2025-2027 64.6 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $80,000
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 3.4%
Amount from this network $22,000
Total from all networks $640,634
Networks contributing 135
— ◊ —
Who funds Kim
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 64.6 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 86%
$2,261,851
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 99.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 83.2%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 125
Money that arrived near votes $382K
Distinct donors 160
Distinct employers 85
Share of their total fundraising 3.90%
Biggest clusters of timed money
CENTERVIEW
20240930 · 8 contributions · Finance · 5d from vote (post)
$26K
SOUTH JERSEY EYE PHYSICIANS
20230219 · 2 contributions · Health · 11d from vote (post)
$13K
400 CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
20240227 · 2 contributions · Finance · 2d from vote (pre)
$7K
ALPINE SECURITIES
20231205 · 2 contributions · Finance · 4d from vote (mixed)
$7K
BANK OF AMERICA
20231205 · 2 contributions · Finance · 4d from vote (mixed)
$7K
CENTERVIEW
20240916 · 2 contributions · Finance · 2d from vote (pre)
$7K
CENTERVIEW
20240923 · 2 contributions · Finance · 2d from vote (mixed)
$7K
CENTERVIEW
20230930 · 1 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (post)
$7K
CENTERVIEW
20231201 · 1 contributions · Finance · 11d from vote (pre)
$7K
CHIEFTAIN CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
20240330 · 2 contributions · Finance · 8d from vote (post)
$7K
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
CENTERVIEW
22 contributions · cycle 2024
$77K
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY
100 contributions · cycle 2024
$69K
GOOGLE
39 contributions · cycle 2024
$47K
PAFCO
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$23K
KKR
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$23K
BLACKSTONE
10 contributions · cycle 2024
$22K
UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA
31 contributions · cycle 2024
$22K
3 PLUS LOGISTICS
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$20K
JANE STREET CAPITAL
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$20K
SOUTH JERSEY EYE PHYSICIANS
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$20K
AKIN GUMP
12 contributions · cycle 2024
$18K
GOLDMAN SACHS
7 contributions · cycle 2024
$18K
POINT 72
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$16K
RUTGERS UNIVERSITY
143 contributions · cycle 2024
$16K
MCKINSEY
10 contributions · cycle 2024
$16K
BGR
13 contributions · cycle 2026
$15K
FREEDOM MORTGAGE
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$14K
3 PLUS LOGISTICS
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$14K
ASTERA CANCER CARE
12 contributions · cycle 2026
$14K
TURBO AIR
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$14K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Andy Kim comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $1.65M
Disclosed outside spending $1.34M
Dark-money outside spending $311K
Share that is dark money 18.87%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $72
Groups hiding their donors 3
By funding network
LEADERSHIP WITH INTEGRITY PAC
for them $885K · against them $0 · 9 transactions
$885K
WORKING NEW JERSEY
for them $701K · against them $0 · 18 transactions
$701K
UNITED 2024
for them $0 · against them $650K · 6 transactions
$650K
WITH HONOR FUND II, INC.
for them $80K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$80K
MAKE THE ROAD ACTION POLITICAL COMMITTEE
for them $78K · against them $0 · 3 transactions
$78K
VOTE FOR EQUALITY
for them $47K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$47K
COMMITTEE TO BUILD THE ECONOMY
for them $26K · against them $0 · 6 transactions
$26K
INDIVISIBLE ACTION ARIZONA
for them $16K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$16K
FORWARD BLUE
for them $5K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$5K
INDIVISIBLE PROJECT INC.
for them $1K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$1K
THE PEOPLE UNITED PAC
for them $525 · against them $0 · 10 transactions
$525
LCV VICTORY FUND
for them $73 · against them $0 · 3 transactions
$73
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $10 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$10
Groups that hide their donors
501(c)(4) probable · support
$310K
Independent-expenditure entity · support
$1K
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$72
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

142 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $333K to Andy Kim across 364 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $333K
Shared contributors 142
Contributions 364
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 90 199 $150K
2024 70 152 $176K
2026 8 13 $7K
— ◊ —

Andy Kim sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required