Tammy Baldwin
Democrat · WI-2 · 119th Congress
Influence Score
0.0
Not scored
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
0.0
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.0
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$0
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$205,000
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
0.0
/ 10
Revolving door (24 lobbyists) former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
0.0
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
0.0
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
0.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
0.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
0.0
/ 12
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $232.05M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $464K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 99.4 Most exposed
117th · 2021-2023 90.0 Most exposed
118th · 2023-2025 60.5 Moderately exposed
119th · 2025-2027 88.6 Most exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
No top sponsor identified.
— ◊ —
Who funds Baldwin
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
No sponsor relationships on file.
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 0.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
ARENBERG
1 contributions · cycle 2022
$11K
EPIC SYSTEMS
1 contributions · cycle 2022
$5K
AMERICAN ITALIAN FOOD COALITION
1 contributions · cycle 2024
$1K
AIG
1 contributions · cycle 2024
$1K
CAPRI COMMUNITIES
1 contributions · cycle 2022
$1K
FOLEY AND LARDNER
1 contributions · cycle 2022
$1K
ASSOCIATED BANK
1 contributions · cycle 2022
$500
FRIED FRANK
1 contributions · cycle 2024
$500
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
1 contributions · cycle 2022
$500
TOFTE MANAGEMENT
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$400
ENERGY UNLIMITED
1 contributions · cycle 2024
$250
SPANN ASSOCIATES
1 contributions · cycle 2022
$250
U OF NM
1 contributions · cycle 2024
$250
UTSW MED CENTER
1 contributions · cycle 2024
$250
NEXTREQUEST
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$150
PHILIPS
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$150
UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$100
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Tammy Baldwin comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $218K
Disclosed outside spending $218K
Dark-money outside spending $53
Share that is dark money 0.02%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $53
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
VOTEVETS
for them $548K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$548K
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN EQUALITY VOTES PAC
for them $413K · against them $0 · 49 transactions
$413K
RESTORATION PAC
for them $0 · against them $205K · 1 transactions
$205K
VOTE FOR EQUALITY
for them $9K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$9K
PROTECT THE VOTE
for them $5K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$5K
PROGRESSIVE VICTORY PAC
for them $4K · against them $0 · 5 transactions
$4K
LCV VICTORY FUND
for them $53 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$53
TAKEACTION MN FEDERAL FUND
for them $46 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$46
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$53
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

221 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $3.24M to Tammy Baldwin across 518 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $3.24M
Shared contributors 221
Contributions 518
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 9 28 $10K
2024 217 488 $3.23M
2026 2 2 $-200
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
2 former staff members who worked for Tammy Baldwin or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
Lobbyist Former position Firm Clients Filings Years
BRIAN CONLAN Legislative Correspondent, Legislative Assistant-Office of Congresswoman Tammy B… FEDERAL HALL POLICY ADVISORS, LLC 25 119 2024–2025
JOHN ASSINI Legislative Staff - Senator Baldwin, Legislative Staff - Rep Panetta, Senate Ene… HB STRATEGIES 14 95 2023–2025
— ◊ —

Tammy Baldwin is not scored: there is no usable voting record to rank against — either the vote and contribution records have not yet been matched to this member, or this is a non-voting delegate. This is the absence of a score, not a finding of low exposure.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required