Neal P. Dunn
Republican
· FL-2 · 119th Congress
and Research (Chair) · House Committee on Agriculture · and Credit · House Committee on Energy and Commerce · and Trade · House Committee on Veterans' Affairs · House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the United States and the Chinese Communist Party
Influence Score
58.7
Moderately exposed
↓ -4.7
vs 118th (63.4)
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
4.1
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.6
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$112,082
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.6
/ 10
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
7.2
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.2
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
11.2
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
5.5
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
7.3
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
$15,504 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $34.44M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $69K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
| Congress | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 116th · 2019-2021 | 41.7 | Least exposed |
| 117th · 2021-2023 | 50.4 | Moderately exposed |
| 118th · 2023-2025 | 63.4 | Moderately exposed |
| 119th · 2025-2027 | 58.7 | Moderately exposed |
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network
HEALTHCARE FREEDOM SUPER PAC
Total money from this network
$109,635
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network
3.3%
Amount from this network
$61,000
Total from all networks
$1,848,767
Networks contributing
363
— ◊ —
Who funds Dunn
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
97.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
100.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote
1
Money that arrived near votes
$3K
Distinct donors
6
Distinct employers
1
Share of their total fundraising
0.20%
Biggest clusters of timed money
DAYTON PHYSICIANS NETWORK
$3K
WESTFORK DRILLING
$500
DIGESTIVE DISEASE CLINIC
$250
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
HOMEMAKER
$64K
HOMEMAKER
$21K
ADVANCED UROLOGY INSTITUTE
$18K
LEWIS BEAR
$16K
CONTINENTAL PACIFIC
$16K
REGENATIVE LABS
$15K
BILL CRAMER CHEVROLET
$14K
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES
$14K
AUDIENTIS
$13K
SYSTEM SERVICE ENGINEERING
$13K
KEDRICK CERRY
$13K
ADVANCED UROLOGY INSTITUTE
$12K
AHCV
$10K
CALIDI BIO
$10K
CWR CONSTRUCTION
$10K
EASTERN SHIPBUILDING
$10K
AMERICAN DEFENSE INTERNATIONAL
$9K
THE ST JOE
$9K
MIR SCIENTIFIC
$9K
APPLIED RESEARCH ASSOCIATES
$9K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Neal P. Dunn comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
HEALTHCARE FREEDOM SUPER PAC
$111K
COMMUNITY HEALTH COUNCIL PAC DBA BREAST CANCER HEALTH COUNCIL PAC
$16K
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP FUND INC.
$9K
THE GUARDIAN FUND
$902
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY VICTORY FUND (EVERYTOWN VICTORY FUND)
$862
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
41 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $632K to Neal P. Dunn across 77 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$632K
Shared contributors
41
Contributions
77
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 10 | 20 | $236K |
| 2024 | 13 | 18 | $216K |
| 2026 | 31 | 39 | $180K |
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
2 former staff members
who worked for Neal P. Dunn or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
| Lobbyist | Former position | Firm | Clients | Filings | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MICHAEL LOWRY | Chief of Staff, Representative Robert B. Aderholt; Chief of Staff, Representativ… | BACKSTOP STRATEGIES, LLC | 2 | 3 | 2025–2025 |
| TUCKER WILLIAMSON | Staff Assistant to Office of Representative Andrew Clyde (2022); Staff Assistant… | HOGAN LOVELLS US LLP | 2 | 2 | 2025–2025 |
— ◊ —
Neal P. Dunn sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required