Doris O. Matsui
Democrat · CA-7 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Energy and Commerce · House Committee on Rules
Influence Score
61.6
Moderately exposed
↓ -3.3 vs 118th (64.9)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
5.4
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.1
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$1,264
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$120,000
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.6
/ 10
Revolving door (5 lobbyists) former staff now working as lobbyists
1.4
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
7.3
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.8
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
12.4
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
5.7
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
3.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
7.2
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $11,001 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $34.44M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $69K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 54.3 Moderately exposed
117th · 2021-2023 56.9 Moderately exposed
118th · 2023-2025 64.9 Moderately exposed
119th · 2025-2027 61.6 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $60,000
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 1.8%
Amount from this network $40,000
Total from all networks $2,214,410
Networks contributing 315
— ◊ —
Who funds Matsui
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 61.6 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 82%
$949,140
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 94.8%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 89.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 2
Money that arrived near votes $4K
Distinct donors 2
Distinct employers 2
Share of their total fundraising 0.63%
Biggest clusters of timed money
GOOGLE
20230728 · 1 contributions · Tech · 3d from vote (post)
$3K
VMWARE
20240305 · 1 contributions · Tech · 6d from vote (pre)
$1K
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
SUTTER HEALTH
12 contributions · cycle 2026
$23K
DISH NETWORK
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$12K
UC DAVIS
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
THE DASCHLE
5 contributions · cycle 2022
$8K
DISH NETWORK
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
SUTTER
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$8K
BGR
9 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
CTC GLOBAL
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
GRANITE TELECOM
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
VMWARE
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
DOWNEY BRAND LLP
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
EVGO
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
FULCRUM PROPERTY
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
GRANITE TELECOM
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
KORSHAK KRACOFF KONG SUGANO LLP
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
SYPHAX STRATEGIC
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
NEWS
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
AKT DEVELOPMENT
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
BREAKTHROUGH ENERGY BILL MELINDA G
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
BUCHANAN INGERSOLL ROONEY
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Doris O. Matsui comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $2K
Disclosed outside spending $2K
Dark-money outside spending $8
Share that is dark money 0.46%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
REJECT AIPAC PAC
for them $0 · against them $120K · 2 transactions
$120K
COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC
for them $2K · against them $0 · 68 transactions
$2K
TOGETHER WE THRIVE
for them $750 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$750
DEMOCRACY PAC
for them $195 · against them $0 · 7 transactions
$195
NEVADA ADVOCATES FOR PLANNED PARENTHOOD AFFILIATES PAC (NAPPA PAC)
for them $122 · against them $0 · 5 transactions
$122
PARTY_C00453712
for them $72 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$72
NEA ADVOCACY FUND
for them $67 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$67
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $30 · against them $0 · 3 transactions
$30
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$8
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT · NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$525.74M
SMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$47.25M
AB PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$25.50M
HMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
CARE IN ACTION PAC
NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$6.60M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

25 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $616K to Doris O. Matsui across 53 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $616K
Shared contributors 25
Contributions 53
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 23 35 $257K
2024 5 15 $319K
2026 3 3 $40K
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
5 former staff members who worked for Doris O. Matsui or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
Lobbyist Former position Firm Clients Filings Years
JOSEPH TRAHERN Chief of Staff Rep. Bob Matsui; Chief of Staff Rep. Doris Matsui K&L GATES, LLP 16 18 2024–2025
JULIE EDDY ROKALA Chief of Staff- Congresswoman Doris Matsui; Special Assistant to the President; … CASSIDY & ASSOCIATES, INC. 11 11 2023–2025
CLARE CHMIEL previous position held: scheduler/aide, U.S. Representative Doris Matsui POLSINELLI PC 8 69 2023–2025
JOEL BAILEY COS Rep. Panetta; LD Rep. Ashford; LD Rep. Matheson; Sr.LA Rep. Matsui; LA, Sr. … BGR GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS 1 8 2023–2025
FLYNN RICO-JOHNSON Commissioner Starks(FCC):6/24-6/25:Policy Advisor;Office of Congresswoman Matsui… NVIDIA CORPORATION 1 4 2025–2025
— ◊ —

Doris O. Matsui sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required