Adelita S. Grijalva
Democrat · AZ-7 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Education and Workforce · and Secondary Education · House Committee on Natural Resources
Influence Score
37.9
Least exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
1.5
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
2.1
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$1,207,598
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$424,457
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.5
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
9.0
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.2
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
8.7
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
2.9
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
1.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
0.2
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
JSTREETPAC $5,000 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $21.66M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing Japan, South Korea, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $43K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $156,375
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 27.9%
Amount from this network $436,250
Total from all networks $1,563,876
Networks contributing 86
— ◊ —
Who funds Grijalva
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 37.9 · Least exposed · votes with them 89%
$1,462,748
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 95.4%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 16.1%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
PIMA COUNTY
51 contributions · cycle 2026
$15K
UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA
31 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
NEXXUS CONSULTING
5 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
PERRY WHITE ROSS AND JACOBSON
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$5K
CITY OF TUCSON
15 contributions · cycle 2026
$5K
AT T
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
D P CREATIVE STRATEGIES
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
HERRERA ARELLANO LLP
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
WITHME
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
DWE MANAGEMENT
12 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
CITY OF SAN LUIS
1 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
GREGORY MOORE REAL ESTATE
1 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
OGILVY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
TEP
5 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
OGILVY
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$3K
SUVIDA HEALTHCARE
14 contributions · cycle 2026
$3K
PIMA COMMUNITY COLLEGE
9 contributions · cycle 2026
$3K
ALTRIA CLIENT SERVICES
1 contributions · cycle 2026
$3K
CENTER FOR BIOLOGICAL DIVERSITY
8 contributions · cycle 2026
$3K
ACPA
1 contributions · cycle 2026
$2K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Adelita S. Grijalva comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $619K
Disclosed outside spending $559K
Dark-money outside spending $60K
Share that is dark money 9.73%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $60K
Groups hiding their donors 2
By funding network
PROGRESSIVE PROMISE
for them $436K · against them $0 · 9 transactions
$436K
TUCSON FAMILIES FED UP PAC
for them $0 · against them $424K · 29 transactions
$424K
WFP IE COMMITTEE
for them $404K · against them $0 · 16 transactions
$404K
THE 1861 INITIATIVE
for them $160K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$160K
LCV VICTORY FUND
for them $120K · against them $0 · 9 transactions
$120K
AMERICAS FUTURE PROJECT PAC
for them $35K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$35K
VOTE NURSES VALUES POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE: CALIFORNIA NURSES ASSOCIATION
for them $20K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$20K
MEDICARE FOR ALL
for them $20K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$20K
VOTAR ES PODER PAC
for them $12K · against them $0 · 8 transactions
$12K
Groups that hide their donors
501(c)(4) confirmed · support
$60K
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$240
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

7 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $18K to Adelita S. Grijalva across 9 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $18K
Shared contributors 7
Contributions 9
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2026 7 9 $18K
— ◊ —

Adelita S. Grijalva ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required