Emily Randall
Democrat · WA-6 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Natural Resources · House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform
Influence Score
49.0
Least exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
2.4
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
4.4
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$5,555,265
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.0
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
9.2
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
11.3
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
4.1
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
1.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
2.4
/ 12
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $22.91M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing Japan, South Korea, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $46K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network FAIRSHAKE
Total money from this network $1,491,280
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Network EQUALITY PAC
Share from this one network 5.2%
Amount from this network $33,500
Total from all networks $639,925
Networks contributing 141
— ◊ —
Who funds Randall
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 49.0 · Least exposed · votes with them 90%
$5,979,012
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 13.3%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 97.5%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
RAIKES
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
SOUTHERN STATES
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
AMAZON COM
12 contributions · cycle 2024
$12K
MICROSOFT
6 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
MICROSOFT
13 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
BLUE WAVE POLITICAL
11 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
D P CREATIVE STRATEGIES
8 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
SECOND AVENUE
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON
20 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
AMAZON COM
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
VALVE
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
BURKE MUSEUM
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
SUR LEGAL COLLABORATIVE
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
TOWER VENTURES
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
WINKLEVOSS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
GOOGLE
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$6K
RS DIVERSIFIED
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$6K
EAGLE HARBOR CHURCH
12 contributions · cycle 2024
$5K
SOUTH KITSAP SCHOOL DISTRICT
61 contributions · cycle 2024
$5K
INVARIANT GR
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$5K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Emily Randall comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $2.69M
Disclosed outside spending $2.69M
Dark-money outside spending $10
Share that is dark money 0.00%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $10
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
FAIRSHAKE
for them $2.98M · against them $0 · 8 transactions
$2.98M
EQUALITY PAC
for them $1.82M · against them $0 · 38 transactions
$1.82M
COLUMBIA NEIGHBORS PAC
for them $623K · against them $0 · 24 transactions
$623K
PROJECT 218
for them $124K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$124K
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ALLIANCE PAC , SERVING WA, AK, ID, HI, IN, KY
for them $8K · against them $0 · 11 transactions
$8K
TOGETHER FOR PROGRESS
for them $1K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$1K
LCV VICTORY FUND
for them $10 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$10
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $10 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$10
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$10
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

27 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $175K to Emily Randall across 38 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $175K
Shared contributors 27
Contributions 38
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2024 24 29 $55K
2026 5 9 $120K
— ◊ —

Emily Randall ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required