David J. Taylor
Republican · OH-2 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Agriculture · Digital Assets · and Rural Development · Risk Management · and Credit · House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · and Hazardous Materials
Influence Score
38.5
Least exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
1.2
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.5
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$63,147
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$2,767
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.1
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
9.1
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
10.4
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
3.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
1.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
1.3
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $9,994 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $19.12M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $38K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $17,500
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 3.4%
Amount from this network $17,500
Total from all networks $520,494
Networks contributing 176
— ◊ —
Who funds Taylor
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 38.5 · Least exposed · votes with them 89%
$270,147
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 0.9%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 58.3%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
TOTAL QUALITY LOGISTICS
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$13K
WINKLEVOSS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$13K
RENT-2-OWN
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$12K
SUNDAY CREEK HORIZONS
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$9K
AMERICAN FINANCIAL
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$8K
AMERICAN FINANCIAL
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
CLERMONT COUNTY
8 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
GOVERNMENT STRATEGIES
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
RENT-2-OWN
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
TWINS BUICK GMC
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
ALTERNATIVE LIVING SOLUTIONS
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$6K
TWINS BUICK GMC
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$6K
CASTELLINI
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$6K
BEST ONE TIRE
5 contributions · cycle 2026
$5K
MARQUIS ENERGY
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$5K
MARQUIS ENERY
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$5K
BEST ONE TIRE
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$4K
TOWNE PROPERTIES
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
ANDURIL INDUSTRIES
1 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
AP TECHNOLGY
1 contributions · cycle 2026
$4K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against David J. Taylor comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $5K
Disclosed outside spending $3K
Dark-money outside spending $2K
Share that is dark money 43.20%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $2K
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
BUILDING A STRONG AMERICA
for them $55K · against them $0 · 6 transactions
$55K
NATIONAL RIGHT TO LIFE VICTORY FUND
for them $5K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$5K
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP FUND INC.
for them $3K · against them $0 · 3 transactions
$3K
SOUTHERN OHIO CONSERVATIVES PAC
for them $0 · against them $3K · 2 transactions
$3K
Groups that hide their donors
c4-funded super PAC · support
$2K
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
JEFFREY J KOLOZE
UNIVERSITY OF PHOENIX · OH · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$8K
GEORGE ERBACHER
OK · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$3K
THOMAS MORRIS
DIMOCK CENTER · MA · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$2K
EDWIN BOTERO
JBS SWIFT · CO · 1 dark entity
coverage 100.0%
$300
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

54 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $92K to David J. Taylor across 73 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $92K
Shared contributors 54
Contributions 73
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2024 7 7 $12K
2026 48 66 $80K
— ◊ —

David J. Taylor ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required