Sarah Mcbride
Democrat · DE-AL · 119th Congress
House Committee on Foreign Affairs · House Committee on Science · and Technology
Influence Score
47.8
Least exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
2.2
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
1.7
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$833,242
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.2
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
7.1
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
11.1
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
4.9
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
2.7
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
4.4
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $10,000 direct
JSTREETPAC $1,450 direct
DMFI PAC $1,000 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $33.21M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $66K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network EQUALITY PAC
Total money from this network $300,223
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 3.3%
Amount from this network $25,000
Total from all networks $767,214
Networks contributing 189
— ◊ —
Who funds Mcbride
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 47.8 · Least exposed · votes with them 82%
$1,221,686
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 2.1%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 100.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT TAYLOR LLP
33 contributions · cycle 2026
$77K
MICROSOFT
25 contributions · cycle 2024
$33K
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT TAYLOR LLP
20 contributions · cycle 2024
$30K
GOOGLE
25 contributions · cycle 2024
$26K
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE
48 contributions · cycle 2024
$16K
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN
65 contributions · cycle 2024
$14K
STATE OF DELAWARE
46 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
CREATIVE ARTISTS AGENCY
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
META PLATFORMS
14 contributions · cycle 2024
$11K
WORLD SAVVY
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
MUNOZ
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
PAUL WEISS RIFKIND WHARTON GARRISON
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
YOUNG CONAWAY STARGATT TAYLOR
11 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
WACHTELL LIPTON ROSEN KATZ
7 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
MORRIS NICHOLS ARSHT TUNNELL LLP
10 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE NEWARK
10 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
POTTER ANDERSON CORROON LLP
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
WILMERHALE
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$9K
U S GOVERNMENT
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
JP MORGAN CHASE
19 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Sarah Mcbride comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $401K
Disclosed outside spending $401K
Dark-money outside spending $10
Share that is dark money 0.00%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $10
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
EQUALITY PAC
for them $605K · against them $0 · 17 transactions
$605K
FAIRSHAKE
for them $226K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$226K
FIRST STATE STRONG FEC
for them $2K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$2K
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $20 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$20
LCV VICTORY FUND
for them $10 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$10
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$10
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

87 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $331K to Sarah Mcbride across 130 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $331K
Shared contributors 87
Contributions 130
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2024 62 96 $222K
2026 29 34 $109K
— ◊ —

Sarah Mcbride ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required