Jeff Hurd
Republican · CO-3 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Natural Resources · House Committee on Science · and Technology · House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure
Influence Score
60.2
Moderately exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
2.1
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
3.2
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$3,015,641
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$215,439
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.7
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
10.2
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
9.2
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
5.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
2.1
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
10.6
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
REPUBLICAN JEWISH COALITION POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE (RJC-PAC) $2,769 direct
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $1,869 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $47.09M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $94K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $564,712
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 10.4%
Amount from this network $99,242
Total from all networks $953,734
Networks contributing 243
— ◊ —
Who funds Hurd
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 60.2 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 93%
$3,385,664
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 1.8%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 7.2%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
SULLIVAN CROMWELL LLP
50 contributions · cycle 2024
$94K
HOMEMAKER
30 contributions · cycle 2026
$86K
HOMEMAKER
33 contributions · cycle 2024
$83K
SULLIVAN CROMWELL LLP
29 contributions · cycle 2026
$74K
TRIBAL FUND
27 contributions · cycle 2026
$63K
TRIBAL FUNDS
18 contributions · cycle 2026
$52K
FULL CIRCLE
6 contributions · cycle 2026
$24K
RDV
7 contributions · cycle 2024
$23K
SULLIVAN CROMWELL
15 contributions · cycle 2024
$22K
SHAW CONSTRUCTION
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$19K
INDY PASS
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$17K
VALMORE GP
6 contributions · cycle 2026
$17K
HASELDEN CONSTRUCTION
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$16K
WHEELER TRIGG O DONNELL LLP
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$15K
IRELAND STAPLETON PRYOR AND PASCOE PC
11 contributions · cycle 2024
$14K
WINKLEVOSS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$14K
CORNERSTONE
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
ENSTROM CANDIES
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
STRYKER AND
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
MOUNTAIN PACIFIC PROPERTIES
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$12K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Jeff Hurd comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $1.70M
Disclosed outside spending $578K
Dark-money outside spending $1.13M
Share that is dark money 66.05%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION
for them $2.23M · against them $0 · 154 transactions
$2.23M
A STRONG INNOVATION ECONOMY REQUIRES STRONG IP PROTECTION
for them $300K · against them $0 · 6 transactions
$300K
SLF PAC
for them $240K · against them $0 · 14 transactions
$240K
UNIFY COLORADO
for them $116K · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$116K
CENTER FORWARD INITIATIVE INC
for them $99K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$99K
OUR AMERICAN CENTURY
for them $0 · against them $96K · 2 transactions
$96K
REAL LEADERSHIP FOR COLORADO
for them $0 · against them $65K · 2 transactions
$65K
ROCKY MOUNTAIN VALUES PAC
for them $0 · against them $55K · 9 transactions
$55K
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP FUND INC.
for them $21K · against them $0 · 7 transactions
$21K
FRIENDS OF CD3
for them $4K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$4K
Groups that hide their donors
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

58 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $1.81M to Jeff Hurd across 193 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $1.81M
Shared contributors 58
Contributions 193
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2024 25 38 $55K
2026 45 155 $1.76M
— ◊ —

Jeff Hurd sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required