Laura Friedman
Democrat · CA-30 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Science · and Technology · House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · Public Buildings · and Emergency Management · and Hazardous Materials
Influence Score
41.7
Least exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
1.4
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
1.4
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$588,964
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$56,283
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.7
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
8.0
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
10.2
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
3.0
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
1.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
3.3
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $5,994 direct
JSTREETPAC $3,600 direct
DMFI PAC $1,000 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $34.85M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $70K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $18,750
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 3.9%
Amount from this network $17,500
Total from all networks $453,841
Networks contributing 119
— ◊ —
Who funds Friedman
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 41.7 · Least exposed · votes with them 85%
$836,294
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 0.4%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 2.7%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
QUINN EMANUEL
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$14K
CHILDREN S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES
19 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
CITY OF LOS ANGELES
28 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
MCS BURBANK
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
ATLAS ENTERTAINMENT
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
DAKE WILSON ARCHITECTS
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY NORTHRIDGE
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
LINKEDIN
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
ADEPT
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
NORAMAX PRODUCTIONS
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
ART ADVISORS
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
BUR-CAL MANAGEMENT
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
DUTCH PET
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
KIESEL LAW LLP
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
MALEKIAN AND ASSOCIATES
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
MCS BURBANK
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
MEBO INTERNATIONAL
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
PACIFIC BMW
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
PROXIMA
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
SAFE MED TRANZ
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Laura Friedman comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $316K
Disclosed outside spending $316K
Dark-money outside spending $59
Share that is dark money 0.02%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $59
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
FIGHTING FOR CALIFORNIANS
for them $584K · against them $0 · 32 transactions
$584K
RESIDENTS FOR STRONG, ETHICAL LEADERSHIP
for them $0 · against them $49K · 1 transactions
$49K
CONSERVLA
for them $0 · against them $7K · 6 transactions
$7K
DGA ACTION
for them $5K · against them $0 · 16 transactions
$5K
COURAGE CALIFORNIA SUPER PAC
for them $275 · against them $0 · 12 transactions
$275
ENVIRONMENT AMERICA ACTION FUND
for them $168 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$168
PLANNED PARENTHOOD ADVOCACY PROJECT LOS ANGELES COUNTY ACTION FUND
for them $105 · against them $0 · 5 transactions
$105
FOOD AND WATER ACTION PAC
for them $86 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$86
LCV VICTORY FUND
for them $61 · against them $0 · 3 transactions
$61
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $20 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$20
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$59
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

42 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $253K to Laura Friedman across 68 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $253K
Shared contributors 42
Contributions 68
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2024 33 47 $156K
2026 18 21 $97K
— ◊ —

Laura Friedman ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required