Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen
Republican
· AS-AL · 119th Congress
House Committee on Foreign Affairs · House Committee on Natural Resources · and Wildlife · Wildlife and Fisheries · House Committee on Small Business · Tax and Capital Access · Trade and Entrepreneurship · House Committee on Veterans' Affairs
Influence Score
18.3
Least exposed
↓ -12.7
vs 118th (31.0)
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
0.1
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.1
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$1,834
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.9
/ 10
Revolving door
former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
5.5
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
0.0
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
0.5
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
3.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
0.2
/ 12
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $31.03M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $62K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
| Congress | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 116th · 2019-2021 | 23.3 | Least exposed |
| 117th · 2021-2023 | 22.0 | Least exposed |
| 118th · 2023-2025 | 31.0 | Least exposed |
| 119th · 2025-2027 | 18.3 | Least exposed |
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICA
Total money from this network
$7,500
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Who funds Radewagen
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
99.9%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
100.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
PACIFIC PRINCESS PARTNERSHIP
$5K
AMERICAN TUNA
$3K
KS
$3K
WILLIAM LFPLC
$3K
BUSINESS OWNER
$3K
WILLIAM LFPLC
$3K
7 BROTHERS
$2K
7 BROTHERS
$2K
AMERICAN TUNA
$2K
WESTERN PACIFI FISHERIES
$2K
WESTERN PACIFIC FISHERIES
$2K
STEAMSHIP TRADE
$2K
AMERICAN TUNA
$1K
OLIVER
$800
CNMI LEGISLATURE
$500
SEKF
$500
SHAWN STEELE LAW FIRM
$500
STEPTOE AND JOHNSON
$500
STEPTOE AND JOHNSON
$500
STEPTOE AND JOHNSON LLP
$500
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
FIREFIGHTERS COALITION OF AMERICA PAC
$2K
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
No such contributions on file.
— ◊ —
Aumua Amata Coleman Radewagen ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required