James E. Clyburn
Democrat · SC-6 · 119th Congress
Housing and Urban Development (Chair) · and Related Agencies (Chair) · House Select Subcommittee on the Coronavirus Crisis (Chair) · House Committee on Appropriations
Influence Score
72.4
Highly exposed
↓ -2.5 vs 118th (74.9)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
12.0
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
< 0.1
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$31
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
3.5
/ 10
Revolving door (1 lobbyist) former staff now working as lobbyists
0.6
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
6.7
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
1.7
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
13.5
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
7.8
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
3.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
8.8
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
JSTREETPAC $8,500 direct
DMFI PAC $1,000 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $146.46M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $293K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 58.9 Moderately exposed
117th · 2021-2023 72.1 Highly exposed
118th · 2023-2025 74.9 Highly exposed
119th · 2025-2027 72.4 Highly exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $142,000
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 1.8%
Amount from this network $71,000
Total from all networks $3,861,454
Networks contributing 481
— ◊ —
Who funds Clyburn
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 72.4 · Highly exposed · votes with them 80%
$2,519,549
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 93.3%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 57.9%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 13
Money that arrived near votes $19K
Distinct donors 13
Distinct employers 12
Share of their total fundraising 1.36%
Biggest clusters of timed money
ARIEL INVESTMENTS
20240904 · 1 contributions · Finance · 14d from vote (pre)
$3K
BLOOMBERG
20240627 · 1 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (mixed)
$3K
BAILEY LAW FIRM
20230727 · 1 contributions · Judiciary · 8d from vote (post)
$2K
TRUIST
20230718 · 1 contributions · Finance · 7d from vote (mixed)
$2K
ALSTON AND BIRD LLP
20231201 · 1 contributions · Judiciary · 1d from vote (post)
$1K
BUSINESS BUYERS UNIVERSITY
20231024 · 1 contributions · Education · 9d from vote (pre)
$1K
GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
20240925 · 1 contributions · Education · 6d from vote (post)
$1K
HAWKINS INVESTMENT
20230720 · 1 contributions · Finance · 6d from vote (mixed)
$1K
HODGSON ROSS LLP
20240923 · 1 contributions · Judiciary · 3d from vote (post)
$1K
NCTA - THE INTERNET TELEVISION ASSOC
20230717 · 1 contributions · Tech · 8d from vote (pre)
$1K
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
THEGROUP
8 contributions · cycle 2022
$17K
ARNOLD VENTURES
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$12K
NEPHRON PHARMACEUTICALS
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$12K
RICELAND HEALTHCARE
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$10K
ALG SENIOR
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$8K
CROWNE
5 contributions · cycle 2022
$8K
CAROLINE COMMERCIAL CONTRACTORS
8 contributions · cycle 2022
$7K
MLP
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$7K
ARNOLD VENTURES
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
EVERGREEN MONEY
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
PIVOTAL VENTURES
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
CAPITOL COUNSEL
9 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
THE MADISON
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
MICROSOFT
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
360 CLINIC PLLC
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
AME CHURCH
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
ANASTOPOULO LAW FIRM
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
APELLA HEALTH
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
ARIEL CAPITAL
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
BLACK STAR INVESTMENTS
2 contributions · cycle 2022
$6K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against James E. Clyburn comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $6K
Disclosed outside spending $6K
Dark-money outside spending $8
Share that is dark money 0.14%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
TOGETHER WE THRIVE
for them $750 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$750
DEMOCRACY PAC
for them $195 · against them $0 · 7 transactions
$195
NEA ADVOCACY FUND
for them $68 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$68
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $30 · against them $0 · 3 transactions
$30
HUMAN RIGHTS CAMPAIGN EQUALITY VOTES PAC
for them $12 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$12
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$8
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT · NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$525.74M
SMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$47.25M
AB PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$25.50M
HMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
CARE IN ACTION PAC
NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$6.60M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

111 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $649K to James E. Clyburn across 132 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $649K
Shared contributors 111
Contributions 132
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 98 112 $182K
2024 11 14 $237K
2026 4 6 $230K
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
1 former staff member who worked for James E. Clyburn or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
Lobbyist Former position Firm Clients Filings Years
KRISTIE JOHNSON Chief of Staff, Rep. Peter DeFazio; Communications Director, Rep. Jim Clyburn; P… NATIONAL BUSINESS AVIATION ASSOCIATION, INC. 1 12 2023–2025
— ◊ —

James E. Clyburn's file shows clear influence markers across multiple categories for the top funding network, placing them in the upper range of this Congress. The pattern runs above what coincidence would produce, and the methodology page documents what each category requires.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required