Pat Harrigan
Republican · NC-10 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Armed Services · House Committee on Science · and Technology
Influence Score
43.3
Least exposed
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
1.9
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
2.4
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$1,654,288
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$1,182,597
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
4.6
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
10.5
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
5.1
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
4.3
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
4.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
1.8
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $14,994 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $39.44M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $79K.
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $396,963
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 2.5%
Amount from this network $20,000
Total from all networks $793,494
Networks contributing 212
— ◊ —
Who funds Harrigan
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 43.3 · Least exposed · votes with them 94%
$1,994,738
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 4.5%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 42.3%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
No suspicious timing patterns detected.
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
HOMEMAKER
10 contributions · cycle 2024
$26K
HOMEMAKER
10 contributions · cycle 2026
$25K
HOMEMAKER
10 contributions · cycle 2022
$19K
CORVID TECHNOLOGIES
6 contributions · cycle 2026
$17K
GRANITE HARDWOODS
5 contributions · cycle 2024
$14K
D H MARKETING
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$14K
WINKLEVOSS CAPITAL MANAGEMENT
6 contributions · cycle 2026
$14K
MAXWELL
5 contributions · cycle 2022
$14K
VETERANS GUARDIAN
5 contributions · cycle 2022
$14K
RISE CAPITAL
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$12K
ANDURIL INDUSTRIES
3 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
SELF EMPLOYED - HOMEMAKER
6 contributions · cycle 2022
$10K
THE KEITH
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
C2 STRATEGIES
7 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
ALG SENIOR
6 contributions · cycle 2022
$9K
D H MARKETING
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
ALG SENIOR
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
INDIAN TRIBE
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
HIGGS FLETCHER MACK
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
ALG SENIOR
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Pat Harrigan comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $2.00M
Disclosed outside spending $1.61M
Dark-money outside spending $395K
Share that is dark money 19.74%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
GOPAC ELECTION FUND
for them $0 · against them $1.18M · 11 transactions
$1.18M
AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY ACTION, INC. (AFP ACTION) DBA CVA ACTION AND DBA LIBRE ACTION
for them $809K · against them $0 · 67 transactions
$809K
WITH HONOR FUND II, INC.
for them $529K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$529K
DEFENDING NC PAC
for them $180K · against them $0 · 8 transactions
$180K
RANGER PAC
for them $50K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$50K
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICA
for them $47K · against them $0 · 4 transactions
$47K
BLACK AMERICANS MAKING AMERICA FIRST
for them $38K · against them $0 · 12 transactions
$38K
FOR JUDICAL FAIRNESS PROJECT; THE
for them $999 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$999
THE GUARDIAN FUND
for them $722 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$722
Groups that hide their donors
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

27 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $74K to Pat Harrigan across 40 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $74K
Shared contributors 27
Contributions 40
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 5 7 $32K
2024 17 23 $19K
2026 9 10 $24K
— ◊ —

Pat Harrigan ranks among the least exposed members of this Congress relative to their colleagues. Money may flow, but the votes do not track the top funding networks. Least exposed is a relative position, not a finding of no exposure.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required