Robin L. Kelly
Democrat · IL-2 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Energy and Commerce · and Trade · House Committee on Oversight and Reform
Influence Score
65.9
Moderately exposed
↓ -4.5 vs 118th (70.4)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
6.0
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.0
/ 6
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.6
/ 10
Revolving door (11 lobbyists) former staff now working as lobbyists
2.1
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
6.5
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
1.0
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
12.6
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
6.6
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
3.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
8.9
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
JSTREETPAC $3,850 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $34.44M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $69K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 57.9 Moderately exposed
117th · 2021-2023 48.9 Moderately exposed
118th · 2023-2025 70.4 Highly exposed
119th · 2025-2027 65.9 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $47,500
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 1.8%
Amount from this network $47,500
Total from all networks $2,634,829
Networks contributing 382
— ◊ —
Who funds Kelly
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 65.9 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 79%
$1,050,425
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 2.1%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 42.9%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 4
Money that arrived near votes $8K
Distinct donors 4
Distinct employers 4
Share of their total fundraising 0.82%
Biggest clusters of timed money
GILEAD SCIENCE
20240205 · 1 contributions · Health · 2d from vote (pre)
$3K
GILEAD SCIENCES
20240318 · 1 contributions · Health · 11d from vote (post)
$2K
GILEAD
20240930 · 1 contributions · Health · 12d from vote (post)
$2K
VITAS HEALTHCARE
20240117 · 1 contributions · Health · 1d from vote (pre)
$1K
GENENTECH
20240919 · 1 contributions · Health · 1d from vote (post)
$259
GENENTECH
20240922 · 1 contributions · Health · 4d from vote (post)
$259
GENENTECH
20240923 · 1 contributions · Health · 5d from vote (post)
$259
GENENTECH
20240925 · 1 contributions · Health · 7d from vote (post)
$259
GENENTECH
20240917 · 1 contributions · Health · 1d from vote (mixed)
$250
GENENTECH
20240920 · 1 contributions · Health · 2d from vote (post)
$250
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
UNIVERSITY OF INDIANA
19 contributions · cycle 2022
$13K
ARIEL INVESTMENTS
5 contributions · cycle 2022
$12K
CHATHAM BUSINESS
8 contributions · cycle 2024
$11K
SMITH DAWSON ANDREWS
9 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
STATE OF ILLINOIS
31 contributions · cycle 2022
$10K
VALENTINE AUSTRIACO AND BUESCHEL
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$9K
CHICAGO CRED
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
GILEAD SCIENCES
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$8K
STATE OF ILLINOIS
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
ARIEL INVESTMENTS
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
IRELL MANELLA LLP
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
NEWSWEB
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
SMITH LACIEN LLP
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
SUPREME SOLUTIONS
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
ARIEL INVESTMENTS
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
SUPREME SOLUTIONS
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
GUARDANT HEALTH
7 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
NEWSWEB
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
RPA
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$7K
JAMES H LOWRY ASSOCIATES
2 contributions · cycle 2024
$6K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Robin L. Kelly comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $66K
Disclosed outside spending $66K
Dark-money outside spending $8
Share that is dark money 0.01%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
DEMOCRACY PAC
for them $72 · against them $0 · 2 transactions
$72
SIERRA CLUB INDEPENDENT ACTION
for them $10 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$10
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$8
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT · NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$525.74M
SMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$47.25M
AB PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$25.50M
HMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
CARE IN ACTION PAC
NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$6.60M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

88 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $933K to Robin L. Kelly across 188 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $933K
Shared contributors 88
Contributions 188
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 37 81 $418K
2024 62 94 $436K
2026 8 13 $79K
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
3 former staff members who worked for Robin L. Kelly or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
Lobbyist Former position Firm Clients Filings Years
E. GARRETT Chief of Staff-Rep. Robin Kelly; Policy Dir.-Political Advisor to VP Joseph Bide… EMPIRE CONSULTING GROUP 13 15 2023–2025
ED GERAK Senator Sinema, Senator Kelly, Congressman Grijalva, Congressman Ciscomani and C… IRRIGATION AND ELECTRICAL DISTRICTS ASSOCIATION OF ARIZONA, INC. 1 4 2023–2025
JENELL BIGGS SMOLOVA Arizona congressional delegation staff from Senator Kelly and Sinema offices; Re… UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA 1 6 2023–2025
— ◊ —

Robin L. Kelly sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required