Ronny Jackson
Republican
· TX-13 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Agriculture · and Biotechnology · and Poultry · House Committee on Armed Services · House Committee on Foreign Affairs · Global Health · and Global Human Rights · North Africa · and Global Counterterrorism · House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence
Influence Score
59.2
Moderately exposed
↓ -3.2
vs 118th (62.4)
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
2.9
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.1
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$4,390
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.2
/ 10
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
7.5
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.1
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
11.4
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
4.2
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
10.0
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
5.4
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
$37,413 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $42.50M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $85K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
| Congress | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 116th · 2019-2021 | — | — |
| 117th · 2021-2023 | 59.9 | Moderately exposed |
| 118th · 2023-2025 | — | — |
| 119th · 2025-2027 | 59.2 | Moderately exposed |
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Network
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICA
Total money from this network
$45,000
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network
3.1%
Amount from this network
$42,413
Total from all networks
$1,374,065
Networks contributing
245
— ◊ —
Who funds Jackson
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
0.9%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote
1
Money that arrived near votes
$2K
Distinct donors
1
Distinct employers
1
Share of their total fundraising
0.05%
Biggest clusters of timed money
RAYTHEON
$2K
BOEING
$95
CACI
$95
RAYTHEON
$51
RAYTHEON
$46
RAYTHEON
$39
RAYTHEON
$24
RAYTHEON
$20
RAYTHEON
$15
RAYTHEON
$15
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
HOMEMAKER
$48K
HOMEMAKER
$48K
DEASON CAPITAL SERVICES
$13K
SBG
$12K
RELIABLE
$11K
ALBERS AEROSPACE
$11K
DISCOVERY OPERATING
$10K
BUDWEISER DISTRIBUTING
$10K
BURK ROYALTY
$10K
ARCHER AUTO GREOUP
$9K
HILLWOOD
$9K
NORTHEAST COVERAGES
$9K
RK
$9K
SAULSBURY INDUSTRIES
$9K
CORNERSTONE GOVERNMENT AFFAIRS
$8K
SELF EMPLOYED - HOMEMAKER
$8K
BURK ROYALTY
$8K
ASTRAZENECA
$8K
GTN TECHNICAL STAFFING
$8K
RESMED
$8K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Ronny Jackson comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
MILES OF GREATNESS FUND, INC.
$1.21M
CLUB FOR GROWTH ACTION
$606K
FIRED UP PAC
$278K
AMARILLO MATTERS PAC
$75K
SPECIAL OPERATIONS FOR AMERICA
$75K
FUTURE45
$44K
REPUBLICAN LEADERSHIP FUND INC.
$12K
HOUSE FREEDOM ACTION
$6K
GUN OWNERS OF AMERICA, INC. POLITICAL VICTORY FUND
$3K
THE GUARDIAN FUND
$902
TEXAS ALLIANCE FOR LIFE FED PAC
$582
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
65 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $335K to Ronny Jackson across 173 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$335K
Shared contributors
65
Contributions
173
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 20 | 73 | $18K |
| 2024 | 44 | 81 | $298K |
| 2026 | 9 | 19 | $19K |
— ◊ —
Revolving Door
1 former staff member
who worked for Ronny Jackson or the committees they serve are now registered lobbyists.
| Lobbyist | Former position | Firm | Clients | Filings | Years |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JEFFREY BILLMAN | Chief of Staff, Rep. Ronny Jackson; Dep. Chief of Staff, Rep. Kevin Brady; Dep. … | AXADVOCACY GOVERNMENT RELATIONS | 19 | 59 | 2025–2025 |
— ◊ —
Ronny Jackson sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required