Jake Auchincloss
Democrat
· MA-4 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Energy and Commerce · House Committee on Financial Services · International Development · and Monetary Policy · House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure · and Hazardous Materials
Influence Score
57.8
Moderately exposed
↑ +7.3
vs 118th (50.5)
— ◊ —
This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.
Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
3.9
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.3
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$28,559
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
5.6
/ 10
Revolving door
former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
6.1
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
0.5
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
0.0
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
11.4
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
5.3
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
3.3
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
9.8
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE
$45,321 direct
NORPAC
$15,700 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $34.44M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $69K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
| Congress | Score | Tier |
|---|---|---|
| 116th · 2019-2021 | — | — |
| 117th · 2021-2023 | 59.7 | Moderately exposed |
| 118th · 2023-2025 | 50.5 | Moderately exposed |
| 119th · 2025-2027 | 57.8 | Moderately exposed |
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network
$34,500
Number of funding networks contributing
1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network
3.8%
Amount from this network
$55,321
Total from all networks
$1,444,784
Networks contributing
295
— ◊ —
Who funds Auchincloss
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate
2.0%
Extra weight when money matches their committees
1.50×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas
100.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote
7
Money that arrived near votes
$15K
Distinct donors
7
Distinct employers
7
Share of their total fundraising
0.43%
Biggest clusters of timed money
ALPHABET
$3K
LESSAC TECHNOLOGIES
$3K
MASS GENERAL HOSPITAL
$3K
ASTRAZENECA
$2K
BIOGEN
$1K
NEW GENERATION ADVISORS
$1K
TRIS PHARMA
$1K
LONESTAR DATA
$500
MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL
$500
BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL
$250
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
BAIN CAPITAL
$41K
RA CAPITAL
$40K
DEERFIELD MANAGEMENT
$34K
BLACKSTONE
$32K
BERKSHIRE
$30K
ANDREESSEN HOROWITZ
$26K
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES
$25K
ELLIOTT INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT
$23K
BERKSHIRE
$23K
RTW INVESTMENTS
$22K
BAIN CAPITAL
$21K
BAIN CAPITAL
$21K
LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE
$20K
APOLLO GLOBAL MANAGEMENT
$20K
KECHES LAW
$19K
GREAT HILL
$17K
FLAGSHIP PIONEERING
$17K
BLACKSTONE
$17K
LIBERTY MUTUAL
$17K
BLACKSTONE
$16K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Jake Auchincloss comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
By funding network
EXPERIENCED LEADERSHIP MATTERS PAC
$1.07M
WOMEN VOTE
$887K
WITH HONOR FUND II, INC.
$53K
VOTEVETS
$19K
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.
406 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $1.26M to Jake Auchincloss across 563 contributions.
Total from shared contributors
$1.26M
Shared contributors
406
Contributions
563
By cycle
| Cycle | Shared donors | Gifts | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | 77 | 114 | $463K |
| 2024 | 200 | 247 | $434K |
| 2026 | 181 | 202 | $364K |
— ◊ —
Jake Auchincloss sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.
Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required