Jay Obernolte
Republican · CA-23 · 119th Congress
House Committee on Science (Chair) · House Committee on Energy and Commerce · and Trade · House Committee on Natural Resources · and Public Lands · and Technology · House Committee on the Budget
Influence Score
65.7
Moderately exposed
↑ +8.5 vs 118th (57.2)
— ◊ —

This score measures financial influence across twelve categories. Each bar shows how this member compares to all others in Congress. Longer bars mean more exposure.

Score breakdown — twelve categories
Contributionsmoney from PACs (political action committees) and individual donors
5.5
/ 12
Outside spendingmoney spent by groups to help elect them
0.4
/ 6
Spent to help elect them
$52,882
Outside groups that spent to help elect this member — this drives the outside-spending bar above
Spent to defeat this member
$22,009
Outside groups that spent to defeat this member (not counted in this score)
Lobbyinghow hard lobbyists push the committees this member sits on
8.9
/ 10
Revolving door former staff now working as lobbyists
0.0
/ 3
Vote alignmenthow often they vote the way their donors want
6.6
/ 12
Contribution timingmoney arriving near key votes
5.2
/ 6
Stock tradesbuying stocks in industries they regulate
0.0
/ 1
Dark moneyfunding from groups that hide their donors
< 0.1
/ 2
Outbound money distributionmoney this member sends out to the party and to colleagues
10.4
/ 16
Cluster network breadthhow many coordinated funding networks back this member
5.5
/ 10
Committee jurisdiction powerthe legislative reach of the committees this member sits on
6.1
/ 10
Foreign interestforeign-interest money — Israel-policy PACs and FARA-registered institutional lobbying allocated by committee jurisdiction
3.9
/ 12
Israel-policy PACs behind this score
AMERICAN ISRAEL PUBLIC AFFAIRS COMMITTEE POLITICAL ACTION COMMITTEE $6,006 direct
FARA institutional lobbying
This member’s committees are targeted by $175.99M in lobbying from FARA-registered firms representing South Korea, Japan, Saudi Arabia. This exposure is weighted at 0.2% of face value in the score — $352K.
— ◊ —
Score across four congresses
Score and tier for each Congress. Members are ranked against others in the same Congress, so tiers are comparable across rows. Raw scores reflect different data availability per Congress.
Congress Score Tier
116th · 2019-2021 &mdash;
117th · 2021-2023 43.1 Least exposed
118th · 2023-2025 57.2 Moderately exposed
119th · 2025-2027 65.7 Moderately exposed
— ◊ —
Biggest funding source
The single network behind the most money and influence
Total money from this network $54,538
Number of funding networks contributing 1
— ◊ —
Where most of the money comes from
What share of their combined contributions and outside spending comes from a single network. Party committees are excluded.
Share from this one network 1.8%
Amount from this network $33,500
Total from all networks $1,896,767
Networks contributing 356
— ◊ —
Who funds Obernolte
Every funding network we can measure, ranked by influence
score 65.7 · Moderately exposed · votes with them 80%
$1,011,662
— ◊ —
Does the money match their power?
Whether their money comes from the industries their committees actually oversee
Money from industries they regulate 1.8%
Extra weight when money matches their committees 2.00×
Share of outside spending tied to their policy areas 0.0%
— ◊ —
Money timed to key votes
Donations arriving near key votes in the policy areas this member regulates
Times money arrived near a vote 5
Money that arrived near votes $27K
Distinct donors 9
Distinct employers 4
Share of their total fundraising 4.32%
Biggest clusters of timed money
GOOGLE
20241212 · 3 contributions · Tech · 6d from vote (pre)
$10K
COTHRAN INSURANCE AGENCY
20230922 · 2 contributions · Finance · 5d from vote (pre)
$7K
FIA INSURANCE SERVICES
20230930 · 2 contributions · Finance · 1d from vote (post)
$7K
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES
20240513 · 1 contributions · Tech · 2d from vote (mixed)
$3K
GOOGLE
20241215 · 1 contributions · Tech · 3d from vote (pre)
$1K
APPLE
20240326 · 1 contributions · Tech · 13d from vote (post)
$500
GENERAL DYNAMICS
20231031 · 1 contributions · Defense · 2d from vote (pre)
$500
NATIONAL UNIVERSITY BLUE CHIP INVENT
20231113 · 1 contributions · Education · 11d from vote (post)
$500
TOURO UNIVERSITY
20240114 · 1 contributions · Education · 4d from vote (pre)
$500
ARMSTRONG FAIRWAY INSURANCE AGENCY IN
20230630 · 1 contributions · Finance · 7d from vote (mixed)
$250
— ◊ —
Top Donors
Biggest sources of contributions, grouped by employer, this cycle
LIGHTHOUSE
6 contributions · cycle 2026
$21K
GOOGLE
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$18K
APPLE VALLEY COMMUNICATIONS
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$16K
CHANDI USA
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
ROUTE 66 SHOOTING
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$13K
ESRI
4 contributions · cycle 2024
$12K
ESRI
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$12K
EXQUADRUM
6 contributions · cycle 2022
$12K
CALIFORNIA STRATEGIES
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$11K
KAREM AIRCRAFT
9 contributions · cycle 2022
$11K
INNOVATIVE FEDERAL STRATEGIES
6 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE POLICY
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$10K
CALYPSO AI
3 contributions · cycle 2024
$10K
SNOW SUGAR SHOP
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$9K
EAGLE CREEK AVIATION
4 contributions · cycle 2022
$8K
MGR PROPERTY MANAGEMENT
3 contributions · cycle 2022
$8K
ANTHROPIC PBC
4 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
ALIMETER CAPITOL
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
CARTE VERTE MANAGEMENT
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
DAYTON FAMILY
2 contributions · cycle 2026
$7K
Where the outside money comes from
How much of the outside spending for and against Jay Obernolte comes from groups that disclose their donors versus groups that hide them
Total outside spending received $75K
Disclosed outside spending $75K
Dark-money outside spending $8
Share that is dark money 0.01%
Dark money tied to their policy areas $0
Groups hiding their donors 1
By funding network
PEOPLE FOR BETTER GOVERNMENT COMMITTEE OF THE YUHAAVIATAM OF SAN MANUEL NATION
for them $383K · against them $0 · 12 transactions
$383K
UNITE AMERICA REFORM FUND
for them $32K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$32K
EQUALITY CALIFORNIA VOTES
for them $0 · against them $22K · 1 transactions
$22K
ALLIANCE FOR PHARMACY COMPOUNDING PAC (COMP PAC)
for them $2K · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$2K
REFORM LEADERS PAC
for them $157 · against them $0 · 1 transactions
$157
DEMOCRACY PAC
for them $0 · against them $124 · 5 transactions
$124
Groups that hide their donors
1 smaller group under $500
tiny cost-allocation expenditures, not listed individually
$8
Likely donors behind the dark money supporting this member Inferred
Donors who fund the disclosed PACs in the same network as the hidden groups above. "Coverage" is how many of that network's disclosed groups a donor funds — the more they fund, the more likely they also back the hidden group.
NEVADANS FOR STEVEN HORSFORD
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
TITUS FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$80K
SUSIE LEE FOR CONGRESS
NV · 1 dark entity
coverage 21.0%
$79K
GEORGE SOROS
SOROS FUND MANAGEMENT · NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$525.74M
SMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$81.00M
BLACKPAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$47.25M
AB PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$25.50M
HMP
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
HOUSE MAJORITY PAC
DC · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$15.00M
CARE IN ACTION PAC
NY · 1 dark entity
coverage 14.0%
$6.60M
— ◊ —
Pro-Israel network donors
This counts contributions to this member from individuals whose FEC filings also show contributions to one of the 16 pro-Israel political action committees tracked by the Index. It is a measure of donor overlap — not a claim about why any individual gave, and not part of the influence score.

5 individuals who also gave to pro-Israel PACs contributed $9K to Jay Obernolte across 6 contributions.

Total from shared contributors $9K
Shared contributors 5
Contributions 6
By cycle
Cycle Shared donors Gifts Total
2022 1 2 $500
2024 4 4 $8K
— ◊ —

Jay Obernolte sits in the middle of this Congress on the index. There is a measured sponsor relationship, but the vote-alignment signal is weaker — money flows; the votes do not follow in lockstep.

Data: FEC (Federal Election Commission) filings · 118th–119th Congress · lobbying disclosures · VoteView recorded votes
All findings derived programmatically from public records · No prior knowledge required