← All 2026 races
H6NJ11245

MALINOWSKI, TOM Challenger

 ·  NJ-11 (House)
7.4
Influence Score · 2026
Substantially backed
Non-incumbent — only contributions, independent expenditures, and dark-money exposure are scored. Lobbying, vote alignment, bundle timing, and trade direction require committee assignments and roll-call records, neither of which exist for a non-sitting candidate. Maximum reachable score is about 23, on a challenger-only scale — incumbents are scored 0–100 across all twelve axes, so the two are not directly comparable. See methodology.

Score components

AxisRawNormalized (pts)Coverage
Direct contributions $1.51M 5.73 2026 cycle, principal committee
Outside spending — direct support $1.47M PACs that directly supported this candidate
Outside spending — indirect (OPPOSE against opponents) $0 OPPOSE spending against opponents in the same race, attributed proportionally
Outside spending — OPPOSE against this candidate $2.52M PACs that spent to defeat this candidate (not scored on this axis)
Total outside spending in favor $1.47M 1.63 direct + indirect — drives the outside-spending axis
Lobbying exposure Requires committee assignment
Vote alignment Requires voting record
Contribution timing — money arriving near key votes Requires recorded-vote calendar
Dark-money exposure 0.0000 0.00 Disclosed-vs-dark outside spending share
Personal trade direction Requires STOCK Act filings

Race matchup  NJ-11

Candidate Party Status Direct $ Outside $ Score Tier
MALINOWSKI, TOM DEM Chal. $1.51M $1.47M 7.4 Substantially backed
WAY, TAHESHA DEM Chal. $331K $4.57M 4.1 Modestly backed
GILL, BRENDAN W DEM Chal. $664K $378K 3.3 Modestly backed
BEECHER, ZACH DEM Chal. $497K $927K 3.2 Modestly backed
HATHAWAY, JOE REP Chal. $541K $315K 2.8 Lightly backed
BARTLETT, JOHN DEM Chal. $370K $315K 2.2 Lightly backed
WILLIAMS, ANNA LEE DEM Chal. $19K $315K 0.8 Lightly backed
MEJIA, ANALILIA DEM Inc. $0 $0 0.0 Not scored
SHERRILL, MIKIE DEM Inc. $0 $0 0.0 Not scored

Challenger and open-seat scores reflect contributions, outside spending, and dark-money exposure only — a maximum of about 23. They are not directly comparable to incumbent scores, which run 0–100 across all twelve axes. Compare the dollar columns (Direct $, Outside $) for a like-for-like view.