← All 2026 races
H6AZ01280

GALAN-WOODS, MARLENE Open seat

 ·  AZ-1 (House)
4.5
Influence Score · 2026
Modestly backed
Non-incumbent — only contributions, independent expenditures, and dark-money exposure are scored. Lobbying, vote alignment, bundle timing, and trade direction require committee assignments and roll-call records, neither of which exist for a non-sitting candidate. Maximum reachable score is about 23, on a challenger-only scale — incumbents are scored 0–100 across all twelve axes, so the two are not directly comparable. See methodology.

Score components

AxisRawNormalized (pts)Coverage
Direct contributions $1.18M 4.48 2026 cycle, principal committee
Outside spending — direct support $0 PACs that directly supported this candidate
Outside spending — indirect (OPPOSE against opponents) $2K OPPOSE spending against opponents in the same race, attributed proportionally
Outside spending — OPPOSE against this candidate $0 PACs that spent to defeat this candidate (not scored on this axis)
Total outside spending in favor $2K 0.06 direct + indirect — drives the outside-spending axis
Lobbying exposure Requires committee assignment
Vote alignment Requires voting record
Contribution timing — money arriving near key votes Requires recorded-vote calendar
Dark-money exposure 0.0000 0.00 Disclosed-vs-dark outside spending share
Personal trade direction Requires STOCK Act filings

Race matchup  AZ-1

Candidate Party Status Direct $ Outside $ Score Tier
SCHWEIKERT, DAVID S. REP Inc. $0 $0 12.0 Least exposed
SHAH, AMISH DR. DEM Open $5.49M $13K 8.3 Substantially backed
TREBLE, JONATHAN DEM Open $1.23M $2K 4.7 Modestly backed
GALAN-WOODS, MARLENE DEM Open $1.18M $2K 4.5 Modestly backed
FEELY, THOMAS JAMES REP Open $863K $2K 3.3 Modestly backed
SWOBODA, GINA REP Open $404K $2K 1.6 Lightly backed
MCCARTNEY, RICK DEM Open $290K $2K 1.2 Lightly backed
CHAPLIK, JOSEPH REP Open $205K $45K 1.1 Lightly backed
GORDON, MARK ROBERT DEM Open $222K $2K 0.9 Lightly backed

Challenger and open-seat scores reflect contributions, outside spending, and dark-money exposure only — a maximum of about 23. They are not directly comparable to incumbent scores, which run 0–100 across all twelve axes. Compare the dollar columns (Direct $, Outside $) for a like-for-like view.